Which section would you like to comment on? Please add a separate comment for each section of this scheme.

C27 E - Rampart Road - St Marks Street

How do you feel about this scheme section?

Mostly negative

Do you usually travel in the area covered by this scheme?

Yes

If yes, in the future do you see yourself walking or cycling MORE in the area covered by this scheme?

No

Would you like this scheme section to be made permanent?

No

Do you have any other comments on this scheme section? If not, please comment on the other sections of this scheme or return to look at other schemes

Why have a 24 hour bus lane? The buses do not run 24 hours. The old peak time bus lanes made more sense.

Which section would you like to comment on? Please add a separate comment for each section of this scheme.

C27 E - Rampart Road - St Marks Street

Which of the following do you feel this scheme will achieve?

• None of the suggestions provided are being achieved.

How do you feel about this scheme section?

Negative

What do you like about this scheme section?

• There is nothing to like. It is SO dangerous!

What do you dislike about this scheme section?

• Harder to cycle here

• Badly thought out

Do you usually travel in the area covered by this scheme?

Yes

If yes, in the future do you see yourself walking or cycling MORE in the area covered by this scheme?

No

Would you like this scheme section to be made permanent?

No

Do you have any other comments on this scheme section? If not, please comment on the other sections of this scheme or return to look at other schemes

The design of this section is appalling. The section from Clarendon Road to St Marks Street beggars belief. Heading inbound towards town, cyclists are in real danger. Taxis and delivery drivers (both categories being the worst offenders) regularly park WITHIN the cycle wands and on the pavement. This makes the space useless for cyclists and pedestrians. Was that really the intention? I have lost count of the times I have seen cyclists have to manoeuvre outside of the wands to avoid the parked vehicles in their supposedly safe space. The junction out of St Marks Street is poor and taxis use it as a means to drive down the pavement inside the wands. Coming outbound from the city, the positioning of the end of the bus lane is right opposite the St Marks junction. What a silly place to choose to force buses and other vehicles into conflict! It is dangerous. Then in another example of unthinking stupidity, the bus stop is AFTER the end of the bus lane, just where the wands begin, again putting vehicles in conflict. Why not have the bus stop in the bus lane, a few yards nearer to town and away from the St Marks junction on the opposite side? I can only conclude that whoever designed this section has never driven or cycled this route. The St Marks junction has always been a problem and it is now significantly worse.

Which section would you like to comment on? Please add a separate comment for each section of this scheme.

C27 A - A660: St Anne's Rd - Spring Rd

Which of the following do you feel this scheme will achieve?

• Additional congestion

How do you feel about this scheme section?

Negative

What do you like about this scheme section?

• Nothing

What do you dislike about this scheme section?

• Harder to reach my home/business

• Will feel less safe

• Increased congestion, pollution and traffic delays. Makes Arndale and Headingley High Street a less attractive shopping destination.

Do you usually travel in the area covered by this scheme?

Yes

If yes, in the future do you see yourself walking or cycling MORE in the area covered by this scheme?

No

Would you like this scheme section to be made permanent?

No

Which section would you like to comment on? Please add a separate comment for each section of this scheme.

C27 A - A660: St Anne's Rd - Spring Rd

Which of the following do you feel this scheme will achieve?

• Improve cycling space

• Improve look and feel

How do you feel about this scheme section?

Neutral

What do you like about this scheme section?

• Easier to cycle here

What do you dislike about this scheme section?

• The cycle lane isn't continuous from Alma Rd to the crossroads. This is a really tricky area to cycle through as it's often congested so really needs some cycle infrastructure

Do you usually travel in the area covered by this scheme?

Yes

If yes, in the future do you see yourself walking or cycling MORE in the area covered by this scheme?

Uncertain

Would you like this scheme section to be made permanent?

Yes, but with changes

If you chose 'Yes, but with changes', what changes would you like to see in this scheme section?

As mentioned above. Continuous cycle lane through headingley.

Do you have any other comments on this scheme section? If not, please comment on the other sections of this scheme or return to look at other schemes

Needs to be extended further out along the a660. Headingley is close enough to walk into the city (I used to live there) so the infrastructure also needs to work for those living a little further out where cycling seems more feasible as walking is too far i.e. Adel, Lawnswood, Bramhope. Needs to go at least as far as Lawnswood roundabout

Which section would you like to comment on? Please add a separate comment for each section of this scheme.

C27 B - A660: Richmond Av - Grosvenor Rd

How do you feel about this scheme section?

Negative

What do you like about this scheme section?

• nothing

What do you dislike about this scheme section?

• Harder to cycle here

• Harder to reach my home/business

• the bollards endanger all road users

Do you usually travel in the area covered by this scheme?

Yes

If yes, in the future do you see yourself walking or cycling MORE in the area covered by this scheme?

Uncertain

Would you like this scheme section to be made permanent?

No

Do you have any other comments on this scheme section? If not, please comment on the other sections of this scheme or return to look at other schemes

They should be removed - easy to crash into, makes it harder for cyclists to overtake each other and avoid in-lane collisins, but all are endangered here are as they prevent motorised traffic from pulling in to allow emergncy vehicles to pass